| REGISTERIT'S FREE! |
 |
 |
 |
RECEIVE custom news |
|
|
TRACK your favorites |
|
|
BUILD your fan profile |
|
|
POST messages |
|
| LOGIN | SIGN UP TODAY |
|
| hannibal was blackkkkkkkkkkk |
|
| POSTED Friday , May 12, 2006 02:30:05 AM |
 |
|
|
| REPLIED Wednesday, July 04, 2007 08:02:54 PM |
|
|
| REPLIED Monday , September 24, 2007 01:11:21 PM |
|
Hamilcar357 said:
Your ethnography is beyond crap. Hannibal was not, not, NOT black. If anything, his skin color was red, just like Lebanese, Maltese, Sardinians, and yes, Tunisians of today. All of these people are genetically related as what we call Phoenician.
It's said to see the number of people on here that argu that Hannibal was caucasain. Clearly based of his geographical location it's obvious he was black, red, brown, whatever you want to call it. He was colored not white. So were the other's in the surrounding region. It's amazing how it's overlooked that he was born in Africa. Wikipedia doesn't even state this. Most of the pictures even depict him as white just as they do with everyother great person in history. Not all whites aren't bad and re-write history therefore I don't put all of them in this catagory but there are many that are very stubborn to the truth and will avoid any one that speaks something that out weights what they say. I've seen some people that have really great refereces then I'll see more replys that completly ignore what the previous person stated. It's pointless to argu with a hot-headed white man he will just continue to say you are wrong no matter what you say or show. I don't give up I just let my opponent destroy himself. |
|
 Edit  Reply w/Quote
|
|
|
| REPLIED Monday , September 24, 2007 01:18:24 PM |
|
|
| REPLIED Monday , September 24, 2007 01:32:26 PM |
|
|
| REPLIED Monday , September 24, 2007 01:47:50 PM |
|
|
| REPLIED Monday , September 24, 2007 01:49:22 PM |
|
|
| REPLIED Monday , September 24, 2007 01:57:49 PM |
|
|
| REPLIED Monday , October 12, 2009 07:52:52 AM |
|
First, i4m from South America, so sorry for my english.
First and foremost: Races does not exists. There is characters common to certain populations, and populations that more commonly display certain characters. But race itself does not exists. A western siberian with pink-white skin and blonde-virtually-white hair and a Bantu from the middle of Black Africa are more close genetically than a population of chimpanzee of east africa from another population of the same ape species in the opposite corner. Tell me, if black and white people are differente "races", where the hell do you put the limit? i live in south america, and here is sometimes very difficult to tell if someone is black or white. You should probably think that this has something to do with interbreeding, but that does not work the way you think. Ancestors of humanity were not black nor white; black african men and white european men are byproducts of the adaptation to their respective ecosystems; when they interbreed, the genetic pool of the descendants becomes wider and the more commonly shows "in-between" features, that were way more common on EVERY human about 10.000-20.000 years ago.
"Original" Semitic and North African people has indeed a darker skin that they had today, but that doesn not mean that they look like a black african person. You are using the same ignorant priinciples as Hitler did, who un-scientifically stated that the "original" races were pure ones and the "in-between" characters are a mark of the "mongrel" races. A Statement that only shows the profoundly ignorance of genetics, science, anthropology and history of the moron that states it, being he a dwaf nazi commander or a purist black *******
Hannibal was probably a mixture of North African and Semitic "breeds", probably like Jesus, and like the original egyptians, yes, dark-skinned, "bronze"-skinned if you like, but that DOES NOT MEAN thad they look like a central africa or afro-american man. These "races" are NOT the product of interbreeding between PURE races. These races are probably closer to the original humans breedstock in appearance.
ON the other way, Persians has nothing, NOTHING of black people. They were indo-european. Many of them were blonde and of blue eyes, and their skin were more dark than that of a germanic white, but certainly NOT black (they are often describen as "golden-skinned", as native americans). Afghans, like the famous "afghan girl" of the blue eyes are the original inhabitants of these zones. The Arabian inmigration due to the bloody expansion of the Islam.introcudec some semitic features on Iranian people, but the original characters still shows sometimes.
Also, being of the breed of a bloody conqueror does not show any superiority to me . Conquerors are not great men, they are ambitious fools with a lot of luck and of imbeciles that die for they ambitions. You may think that the blood of a conqueror makes you great, it is a totally foolish statement. Conquerors may win, but killing somebody with thay way of thinking would not cause me more moral concerns than killing a hungry dog that tries to bite me.
|
|
|
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
|
|
| REPLIED Monday , October 12, 2009 12:23:49 PM |
|
|
| REPLIED Monday , October 12, 2009 06:23:08 PM |
|
|
| REPLIED Monday , October 12, 2009 06:43:20 PM |
|
|
|
|
