rocco2216 said:

I love the Lizard, but him by himself would really just be 1 and 2 all over again. I don't know, we'll see.

pshyco2004 said:

rocco2216 said:

I love the Lizard, but him by himself would really just be 1 and 2 all over again. I don't know, we'll see.

And 1 & 2 were the best, so that would be just fine for me!

rocco2216 said:

pshyco2004 said:

rocco2216 said:

I love the Lizard, but him by himself would really just be 1 and 2 all over again. I don't know, we'll see.

And 1 & 2 were the best, so that would be just fine for me!

So you really just want a carbon copy of 1 and 2? Then again that's all Sam Raimi can do anyway as much as I like him. I mean Evil Dead 2 is pretty much a carbon copy of Evil Dead 1

pshyco2004 said:

rocco2216 said:

pshyco2004 said:

rocco2216 said:

I love the Lizard, but him by himself would really just be 1 and 2 all over again. I don't know, we'll see.

And 1 & 2 were the best, so that would be just fine for me!

So you really just want a carbon copy of 1 and 2? Then again that's all Sam Raimi can do anyway as much as I like him. I mean Evil Dead 2 is pretty much a carbon copy of Evil Dead 1

How you get that i don't know, 1 & 2 had different villains and different stories how you can consider them as carbon copies is beyond me and who cares about Evil Dead 1 & 2 there were both great either way. And did you not see Drag me to hell? I suppose that a carbon copy as well? Overloading spiderman with villains is going to do the same thing it did to 3, it will screw it up and probably make 3 look even better.

pshyco2004 said:

rocco2216 said:

pshyco2004 said:

rocco2216 said:

I love the Lizard, but him by himself would really just be 1 and 2 all over again. I don't know, we'll see.

And 1 & 2 were the best, so that would be just fine for me!

So you really just want a carbon copy of 1 and 2? Then again that's all Sam Raimi can do anyway as much as I like him. I mean Evil Dead 2 is pretty much a carbon copy of Evil Dead 1

How you get that i don't know, 1 & 2 had different villains and different stories how you can consider them as carbon copies is beyond me and who cares about Evil Dead 1 & 2 there were both great either way. And did you not see Drag me to hell? I suppose that a carbon copy as well? Overloading spiderman with villains is going to do the same thing it did to 3, it will screw it up and probably make 3 look even better.

rocco2216 said:

pshyco2004 said:

rocco2216 said:

pshyco2004 said:

rocco2216 said:

I love the Lizard, but him by himself would really just be 1 and 2 all over again. I don't know, we'll see.

And 1 & 2 were the best, so that would be just fine for me!

So you really just want a carbon copy of 1 and 2? Then again that's all Sam Raimi can do anyway as much as I like him. I mean Evil Dead 2 is pretty much a carbon copy of Evil Dead 1

How you get that i don't know, 1 & 2 had different villains and different stories how you can consider them as carbon copies is beyond me and who cares about Evil Dead 1 & 2 there were both great either way. And did you not see Drag me to hell? I suppose that a carbon copy as well? Overloading spiderman with villains is going to do the same thing it did to 3, it will screw it up and probably make 3 look even better.

I'm not saying Drag Me To Hell was cause that wasn't. I'm not saying there should be 3 villains or even 2, just the Lizard by himself is not enough after what 1, 2, and 3 did. Mary Jane will get kidnapped again and it's another scientist gone bad.

pshyco2004 said:

rocco2216 said:

pshyco2004 said:

rocco2216 said:

pshyco2004 said:

rocco2216 said:

I love the Lizard, but him by himself would really just be 1 and 2 all over again. I don't know, we'll see.

And 1 & 2 were the best, so that would be just fine for me!

So you really just want a carbon copy of 1 and 2? Then again that's all Sam Raimi can do anyway as much as I like him. I mean Evil Dead 2 is pretty much a carbon copy of Evil Dead 1

How you get that i don't know, 1 & 2 had different villains and different stories how you can consider them as carbon copies is beyond me and who cares about Evil Dead 1 & 2 there were both great either way. And did you not see Drag me to hell? I suppose that a carbon copy as well? Overloading spiderman with villains is going to do the same thing it did to 3, it will screw it up and probably make 3 look even better.

I'm not saying Drag Me To Hell was cause that wasn't. I'm not saying there should be 3 villains or even 2, just the Lizard by himself is not enough after what 1, 2, and 3 did. Mary Jane will get kidnapped again and it's another scientist gone bad.

Yeah but from everything that i have heard thus far this will tie into the venom spin off which will tie into spiderman 5 and 6 so highly doubt out of all this the lizzard is all we will get in 4 im sure there going to have a side villain, we shall see.

pshyco2004 said:



And 1 & 2 were the best, so that would be just fine for me!

rocco2216 said:

Spider-Man 4s Lone Villain is The Lizard?
Posted by Neil Miller (neil@filmschoolrejects.c
om) on October 27, 2009




It is safe to assume that the plot details and casting for Sonys upcoming comic adventure Spider-Man 4 will not be kept secret for too much longer, as the films principal shoot is right around the corner. But were remaining skeptical as the rumor-mill keeps churning. Today, the fine folks at MarketSaw claim that theyve got the scoop on Spideys upcoming foes, er, foe.

Per their report, a production insider has confirmed that the fourth film in the Spider-Man franchise will only have one villain, and that it will be The Lizard. Last week, UGO reported that actor Dylan Baker, who previously played Dr. Curt Connors (who notoriously becomes The Lizard), has gotten a call from Sam Raimi about the project. So logic points to this rumor possibly being true. For now, were remaining skeptical until we get something official from the folks at Sony. That said, the prospect of a lean, focused Spider-Man film with a single villain is enticing.

rocco2216 said:

I love the Lizard, but him by himself would really just be 1 and 2 all over again. I don't know, we'll see.

IcEXMaNuSa said:

rocco2216 said:

Spider-Man 4s Lone Villain is The Lizard?
Posted by Neil Miller (neil@filmschoolrejects.c
om) on October 27, 2009




It is safe to assume that the plot details and casting for Sonys upcoming comic adventure Spider-Man 4 will not be kept secret for too much longer, as the films principal shoot is right around the corner. But were remaining skeptical as the rumor-mill keeps churning. Today, the fine folks at MarketSaw claim that theyve got the scoop on Spideys upcoming foes, er, foe.

Per their report, a production insider has confirmed that the fourth film in the Spider-Man franchise will only have one villain, and that it will be The Lizard. Last week, UGO reported that actor Dylan Baker, who previously played Dr. Curt Connors (who notoriously becomes The Lizard), has gotten a call from Sam Raimi about the project. So logic points to this rumor possibly being true. For now, were remaining skeptical until we get something official from the folks at Sony. That said, the prospect of a lean, focused Spider-Man film with a single villain is enticing.

I KNEW that tombstone, kingpin, and the enforcers was BULL. Told ya !

IcEXMaNuSa said:

rocco2216 said:

I love the Lizard, but him by himself would really just be 1 and 2 all over again. I don't know, we'll see.

Well with david lindsay script having the lizard its no wonder. I was a little worried there that gary ross would not only change the story but, change the villian. I just hope that they dont use the hobgoblin crap for the end. I still say that they should add kraven into the mix but, we will have to wait until the official word comes out. So much for that source from IMDB lol, please listen to reason next time silly.

rocco2216 said:

IcEXMaNuSa said:

rocco2216 said:

I love the Lizard, but him by himself would really just be 1 and 2 all over again. I don't know, we'll see.

Well with david lindsay script having the lizard its no wonder. I was a little worried there that gary ross would not only change the story but, change the villian. I just hope that they dont use the hobgoblin crap for the end. I still say that they should add kraven into the mix but, we will have to wait until the official word comes out. So much for that source from IMDB lol, please listen to reason next time silly.

Yeah I wonder too if Roderick Kingsley will be sort of an antagonist/villain. He makes sense since they need someone to take over Oscorp since Norman and Harry are dead ha ha.

IcEXMaNuSa said:

rocco2216 said:

IcEXMaNuSa said:

rocco2216 said:

I love the Lizard, but him by himself would really just be 1 and 2 all over again. I don't know, we'll see.

Well with david lindsay script having the lizard its no wonder. I was a little worried there that gary ross would not only change the story but, change the villian. I just hope that they dont use the hobgoblin crap for the end. I still say that they should add kraven into the mix but, we will have to wait until the official word comes out. So much for that source from IMDB lol, please listen to reason next time silly.

Yeah I wonder too if Roderick Kingsley will be sort of an antagonist/villain. He makes sense since they need someone to take over Oscorp since Norman and Harry are dead ha ha.

who says they died lol ? We all know that the goblin formula brought them back. they are alive and well in the comics today and norman is the #1 villain towards all heroes right now. wouldnt
be surpised if they brought them back but thats way too soon.

rocco2216 said:

IcEXMaNuSa said:

rocco2216 said:

IcEXMaNuSa said:

rocco2216 said:

I love the Lizard, but him by himself would really just be 1 and 2 all over again. I don't know, we'll see.

Well with david lindsay script having the lizard its no wonder. I was a little worried there that gary ross would not only change the story but, change the villian. I just hope that they dont use the hobgoblin crap for the end. I still say that they should add kraven into the mix but, we will have to wait until the official word comes out. So much for that source from IMDB lol, please listen to reason next time silly.

Yeah I wonder too if Roderick Kingsley will be sort of an antagonist/villain. He makes sense since they need someone to take over Oscorp since Norman and Harry are dead ha ha.

who says they died lol ? We all know that the goblin formula brought them back. they are alive and well in the comics today and norman is the #1 villain towards all heroes right now. wouldnt
be surpised if they brought them back but thats way too soon.

Not everything that happened in the comics should happen in the movies lol. Not everything in the comics is great. Some are shitty.

IcEXMaNuSa said:

rocco2216 said:

IcEXMaNuSa said:

rocco2216 said:

IcEXMaNuSa said:

rocco2216 said:

I love the Lizard, but him by himself would really just be 1 and 2 all over again. I don't know, we'll see.

Well with david lindsay script having the lizard its no wonder. I was a little worried there that gary ross would not only change the story but, change the villian. I just hope that they dont use the hobgoblin crap for the end. I still say that they should add kraven into the mix but, we will have to wait until the official word comes out. So much for that source from IMDB lol, please listen to reason next time silly.

Yeah I wonder too if Roderick Kingsley will be sort of an antagonist/villain. He makes sense since they need someone to take over Oscorp since Norman and Harry are dead ha ha.

who says they died lol ? We all know that the goblin formula brought them back. they are alive and well in the comics today and norman is the #1 villain towards all heroes right now. wouldnt
be surpised if they brought them back but thats way too soon.

Not everything that happened in the comics should happen in the movies lol. Not everything in the comics is great. Some are shitty.

jean grey... dark phoenix... x-men last stand lol it can happen lol daredevil... elektra spin off i can keep going but its pointless... dont ever count a character out as being dead and avi arad stated that the same goes for the films... wait a minute i forgot to mention venom lol

rocco2216 said:

Jean Grey and Elektra never died. They made it clear at the end of X-Men 2 that Jean Grey was alive with that Phoenix tease. Xavier said she was in a telkinetic cocoon so she never died. Elektra never died cause when the cops went to where her body was supposed to be, it wasn't there.

IcEXMaNuSa said:

rocco2216 said:

Jean Grey and Elektra never died. They made it clear at the end of X-Men 2 that Jean Grey was alive with that Phoenix tease. Xavier said she was in a telkinetic cocoon so she never died. Elektra never died cause when the cops went to where her body was supposed to be, it wasn't there.

you have to understand that not EVERY ONE is a comic book fan. I know alot of people who were confused when jean grey came back when standing on line for x-men 3. They just didnt get it. It had to be explained to them. It's also like how some people think that chris nolans batman is a continuation of the other batman films ( i mean how dumb can u be really lol ) and that the real killer of bruce waynes parents is the joker thanks to tim burton. You have no idea on how many times I had to smack my face but, we all know that comic book fans stand by the truth. I know that when the harry potter films came out, things had to be explained to me and the same with twlight. So not everyone has an idea about what happens next because they arent familair with the sources.

rocco2216 said:



True, but my point is that that Venom from Spider-Man 3 is dead. Infamous_Emijayne said that it'll be a different character, a reboot of Venom sort of speak. I know it'll confuse the audience and probably fans but that's what Sony is doing.

psycho1 said:



Take it from me, WAIT until OFFICIAL news comes out and not believe RUMORS.

rocco2216 said:

IcEXMaNuSa said:

rocco2216 said:

Jean Grey and Elektra never died. They made it clear at the end of X-Men 2 that Jean Grey was alive with that Phoenix tease. Xavier said she was in a telkinetic cocoon so she never died. Elektra never died cause when the cops went to where her body was supposed to be, it wasn't there.

you have to understand that not EVERY ONE is a comic book fan. I know alot of people who were confused when jean grey came back when standing on line for x-men 3. They just didnt get it. It had to be explained to them. It's also like how some people think that chris nolans batman is a continuation of the other batman films ( i mean how dumb can u be really lol ) and that the real killer of bruce waynes parents is the joker thanks to tim burton. You have no idea on how many times I had to smack my face but, we all know that comic book fans stand by the truth. I know that when the harry potter films came out, things had to be explained to me and the same with twlight. So not everyone has an idea about what happens next because they arent familair with the sources.

True, but my point is that that Venom from Spider-Man 3 is dead. Infamous_Emijayne said that it'll be a different character, a reboot of Venom sort of speak. I know it'll confuse the audience and probably fans but that's what Sony is doing.