| REGISTERIT'S FREE! |
 |
 |
 |
RECEIVE custom news |
 |
 |
TRACK your favorites |
 |
 |
BUILD your fan profile |
 |
 |
POST messages |
 |
| LOGIN | SIGN UP TODAY |
| THIS WEEK |
 |
| ? |
Nothing Scheduled |
 |
| MORE |
|
| Bruce Would Be Mysterio Here Is Why ! |
 |
| POSTED Sunday , September 13, 2009 10:24:11 PM |
|
if for any reason bruce was going to have a MAJOR role, they so gave away which villian. When a fan asked bruce campbell if he would play mysterio for spider-man 4, his response was whats a mysterio. Now look at the headline below for hints...
not saying that his character will be a main villian because we dont know that for sure but, it does say MAJOR role, Not cameo or reg role. Plus, his cameo roles have been in all three films and my question is, why a major role in the fourth film if all of the others were cameos ? ? ?
Source: Access Hollywood
According to Access Hollywood, actor Bruce Campbell has announced that Spider-Man 4 will start shooting in January 2010.
Campbell, who has a long-time friendship with director Sam Raimi, made memorable cameos in the first three Spider-Man films.
However, the actor has been told that he will have a major part this time around, but didnt yet know anything about his character. Fans have speculated that he could take on the role of Mysterio, the master of illusion.
Spider-Man 4 is due in May 2011.
didnt know anything yet about his character... meaning that he does know which character he will play but, knows nothing about the character. I think he is getting a major role this time due to fans annoying him with the cameo questions. On his perspective, they werent really cameos because he named the character, defeated the character, then helped the character. I know he wailed on me about it when I mentioned cameos but youtube bruce campbell answers and questions and you will see what I am talking about.
YoUr fRiEnDLy nEiGhBoRhOOd sPiDeR-MaN
http://www.myspace.com/th e_daily_bugle |
 |
Edit Reply w/quote |
 |
 |
| REPLIED Sunday , September 13, 2009 11:18:25 PM |
|
IcEXMaNuSa said: if for any reason bruce was going to have a MAJOR role, they so gave away which villian. When a fan asked bruce campbell if he would play mysterio for spider-man 4, his response was whats a mysterio. Now look at the headline below for hints...
not saying that his character will be a main villian because we dont know that for sure but, it does say MAJOR role, Not cameo or reg role. Plus, his cameo roles have been in all three films and my question is, why a major role in the fourth film if all of the others were cameos ? ? ?
Source: Access Hollywood
According to Access Hollywood, actor Bruce Campbell has announced that Spider-Man 4 will start shooting in January 2010.
Campbell, who has a long-time friendship with director Sam Raimi, made memorable cameos in the first three Spider-Man films.
However, the actor has been told that he will have a major part this time around, but didnt yet know anything about his character. Fans have speculated that he could take on the role of Mysterio, the master of illusion.
Spider-Man 4 is due in May 2011.
didnt know anything yet about his character... meaning that he does know which character he will play but, knows nothing about the character. I think he is getting a major role this time due to fans annoying him with the cameo questions. On his perspective, they werent really cameos because he named the character, defeated the character, then helped the character. I know he wailed on me about it when I mentioned cameos but youtube bruce campbell answers and questions and you will see what I am talking about.
Dude, are u serious? I really hope you're just bored and joking lol. |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Monday , September 14, 2009 08:28:24 PM |
|
rocco2216 said: IcEXMaNuSa said: if for any reason bruce was going to have a MAJOR role, they so gave away which villian. When a fan asked bruce campbell if he would play mysterio for spider-man 4, his response was whats a mysterio. Now look at the headline below for hints...
not saying that his character will be a main villian because we dont know that for sure but, it does say MAJOR role, Not cameo or reg role. Plus, his cameo roles have been in all three films and my question is, why a major role in the fourth film if all of the others were cameos ? ? ?
Source: Access Hollywood
According to Access Hollywood, actor Bruce Campbell has announced that Spider-Man 4 will start shooting in January 2010.
Campbell, who has a long-time friendship with director Sam Raimi, made memorable cameos in the first three Spider-Man films.
However, the actor has been told that he will have a major part this time around, but didnt yet know anything about his character. Fans have speculated that he could take on the role of Mysterio, the master of illusion.
Spider-Man 4 is due in May 2011.
didnt know anything yet about his character... meaning that he does know which character he will play but, knows nothing about the character. I think he is getting a major role this time due to fans annoying him with the cameo questions. On his perspective, they werent really cameos because he named the character, defeated the character, then helped the character. I know he wailed on me about it when I mentioned cameos but youtube bruce campbell answers and questions and you will see what I am talking about.
Dude, are u serious? I really hope you're just bored and joking lol.
umm... no. there is a HUGE fan base with bruce campbell being mysterio, just like they have one with mary winstead as MJ. Now there is one with evan rachel wood as mj being that she is already playing mj in the musical. Think logically... bruce's roles have been minor and cameo, now it changes to MAJOR ? You know whats coming. Sadly, I rather have kraven and lizard but we will see...
YoUr fRiEnDLy nEiGhBoRhOOd sPiDeR-MaN
http://www.myspace.com/th e_daily_bugle |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Monday , September 14, 2009 09:13:55 PM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Monday , September 14, 2009 09:53:13 PM |
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Monday , September 14, 2009 11:34:39 PM |
|
IcEXMaNuSa said: rocco2216 said: IcEXMaNuSa said: if for any reason bruce was going to have a MAJOR role, they so gave away which villian. When a fan asked bruce campbell if he would play mysterio for spider-man 4, his response was whats a mysterio. Now look at the headline below for hints...
not saying that his character will be a main villian because we dont know that for sure but, it does say MAJOR role, Not cameo or reg role. Plus, his cameo roles have been in all three films and my question is, why a major role in the fourth film if all of the others were cameos ? ? ?
Source: Access Hollywood
According to Access Hollywood, actor Bruce Campbell has announced that Spider-Man 4 will start shooting in January 2010.
Campbell, who has a long-time friendship with director Sam Raimi, made memorable cameos in the first three Spider-Man films.
However, the actor has been told that he will have a major part this time around, but didnt yet know anything about his character. Fans have speculated that he could take on the role of Mysterio, the master of illusion.
Spider-Man 4 is due in May 2011.
didnt know anything yet about his character... meaning that he does know which character he will play but, knows nothing about the character. I think he is getting a major role this time due to fans annoying him with the cameo questions. On his perspective, they werent really cameos because he named the character, defeated the character, then helped the character. I know he wailed on me about it when I mentioned cameos but youtube bruce campbell answers and questions and you will see what I am talking about.
Dude, are u serious? I really hope you're just bored and joking lol.
umm... no. there is a HUGE fan base with bruce campbell being mysterio, just like they have one with mary winstead as MJ. Now there is one with evan rachel wood as mj being that she is already playing mj in the musical. Think logically... bruce's roles have been minor and cameo, now it changes to MAJOR ? You know whats coming. Sadly, I rather have kraven and lizard but we will see...
True, but didn't he say the same thing in the first three. Each character in 1, 2, and 3 had a MAJOR impact on Peter in someway. He named Peter "Spider-Man" in 1, kept him from seeing MJ's play in 2, and tried to help him propose to her in 3. I think it's possibly/obviously the same deal, or maybe a character with a name like Hoffman or Mr. Ditkovitch. But we'll see I guess. I don't think the studio will want Bruce Campbell playing one of the villains. They did want an oscar nominated actor like Mickey Rourke for Kraven afterall. |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Monday , September 14, 2009 11:36:19 PM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Tuesday, September 15, 2009 11:30:14 AM |
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Tuesday, September 15, 2009 01:40:01 PM |
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Thursday, September 17, 2009 10:16:32 PM |
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Friday , September 18, 2009 01:05:48 AM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Friday , September 18, 2009 01:16:49 AM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Friday , September 18, 2009 01:36:16 AM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Friday , September 18, 2009 02:11:45 AM |
|
IcEXMaNuSa said: rocco2216 said: Also, you can find David Lindsey Abaire's first draft/test draft on his WGA (Writers Guild of America) page. The only villain is the Lizard, and Roderick Kingsley is introduced, I guess to take over Oscorp. Now I don't know if maybe the villains will be the Lizard and the Hobgoblin. I hope they don't put in the Hobgoblin, I don't want another goblin.
It's on MovieWeb.com. That guy J.A. Ottley/Director dude said this and even sent me it. Ask him for it too. Here's the conversation.
September 17th, 2009 8:34am
Well i know he portrayed interest from around after part 3 in using the Lizard, because he felt it was time to use Connor and give him his story, and plus side its a story the fans have been urging for.
There was further news of him being interested in bringing in the Sinister Six, that still may happen as for he stated that Spider-man 5 & 6 are back to back features.
He once stated on using Carnage but with a PG-13 certificate, once he saw the fan reaction, he lost interest in the whole concept.
Lastly he portrayed interest in using Morbius, which me personally think is a bad thing, because...
First of all
Vampires don't fit into the whole spiderman universe.
Secondly
It sounded like he was trying to cash cow in the whole Vampires are the next big thing because of Twilight.
Thirdly and finally
Morbius deserves his own movie along with the rest of the Midnight Sons team
(Spam)
rocco2216 September 17th, 2009 1:40am
I really do wonder if Sam Raimi wants/wanted to use the Lizard and Hobgoblin for Spider-Man 4.
(Delete)
rocco2216 September 17th, 2009 1:37am
Good idea, The Agent. I just deleted it.
(Delete)
The Agent September 16th, 2009 4:17am
Sweet.
And guy below me...not a good idea to post your e-mail address on the forums.
(Spam)
J.A.Ottley.Writer / Director September 15th, 2009 11:36pm
I sent you a request, send me you email address and i'll send you the treatment if you want, it not long it only 51 pages, lol
(Spam)
rocco2216 September 15th, 2009 11:02pm
Oh, well then if it's on his WGA page then it is real, thanks J.A. Ottley. I wonder what villain or villains they'll add with the Lizard.
(Delete)
Cripple September 15th, 2009 10:10pm
I would really like to see mysterio. And we need more venom.
(Spam)
J.A.Ottley.Writer / Director September 15th, 2009 10:00pm
It is just lizard.
How i know its not fake, because the same treatment is on Abataire WGA page, so there is no way its a fake unless Abataire himself is a fake.
Its possible they could have improvised it from then on, but then it will probably turn out the same way as SM3.
SM3 was just originally meant to be Sandman & New Goblin with the symbiote ending with it stating that Venom was still alive.
But then they brought in venom for the last 2 drafts, henceforth why it didn't work and why he had so little screen time.
He was mainly introduced because of the fan demand and uproar.
link please, I couldnt find crap on that page lol. |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Friday , September 18, 2009 02:21:09 AM |
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Friday , September 18, 2009 03:17:00 AM |
|
IcEXMaNuSa said: IcEXMaNuSa said: rocco2216 said: Also, you can find David Lindsey Abaire's first draft/test draft on his WGA (Writers Guild of America) page. The only villain is the Lizard, and Roderick Kingsley is introduced, I guess to take over Oscorp. Now I don't know if maybe the villains will be the Lizard and the Hobgoblin. I hope they don't put in the Hobgoblin, I don't want another goblin.
link please, I couldnt find crap on that page lol.
I read the script and its kinda bad, I am going to rewrite the script and send it out EVERY WHERE. and show marvel how a true fan can write a script. My problems with the script, once again we have peter revealing his identity not only to gwen but to curt conners as well. It reminded me of what happened in spider-man 2. I love the idea that mj and pete split and opened up a relationship with gwen. If sony goes with this script even if its polished by peter ross, it will fail horribly. I also didnt feel the so called drama and this guys spelling is horrible. You got to be kidding me sony, this is the best you can do for a writer ? I bet you half of the people on this board that are true fans can write mind blowing scripts. Being that they are filming soon I am going to rewrite the damn thing with MAJOR changes.
Lol, yeah it's not very good. But do you think it's real? And that's why they brought in Gary Ross to rewrite it ha ha. Also, it says that it's a first/test draft. So who knows how many have been written before Gary Ross. I think it's fake because I just don't see Sam Raimi being interested in Roderick Kingsley/Hobgoblin, another goblin, you know. |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Friday , September 18, 2009 03:34:29 AM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Friday , September 18, 2009 01:47:40 PM |
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Friday , September 18, 2009 01:51:40 PM |
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Friday , September 18, 2009 01:54:05 PM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Friday , September 18, 2009 07:49:25 PM |
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Friday , September 18, 2009 08:17:21 PM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Saturday, September 19, 2009 01:28:46 AM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Saturday, September 19, 2009 02:01:48 AM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Saturday, September 19, 2009 02:33:05 AM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Saturday, September 19, 2009 04:02:36 AM |
|
|
|
|