| REGISTERIT'S FREE! |
 |
 |
 |
RECEIVE custom news |
|
|
TRACK your favorites |
|
|
BUILD your fan profile |
|
|
POST messages |
|
| LOGIN | SIGN UP TODAY |
|
| Don't kill off baddies in Comic book Movies. |
|
| POSTED Saturday, November 07, 2009 09:58:44 AM |
 |
How many times do they mess up movies and potential future movies by killing off characters that are good and handy in later stages of movies?
Think of the Green Goblin, maybe he could have come back somehow, regeneration or something, they never really kill them off in the comics.
X-Men 3 Professor X, Cyclops, Gene Grey, maybe as we know the Pheonix force could be ressurected but we never got to see her flaming potential. Maybe in part 4 she puts all the particles together and reforms the lost characters somehow.
I liked X-men 3 but I know many did not.
Again what about Venom, try bringing him back without looking silly and rebooted.
Irony has it that the Joker was still alive in Batman, but the actor for him is dead.
They should do fundimental movies, with the same storylines as the comics, not some other idea, maybe a few tweaks like natural webshooters as that makes more sense overal but Stick to the Gwen Stacy storyline. If the impact was big in the comics why can they not do that in film? Instead the convolute them selves when the answers were in their hands.
But will they learn? I doubt it, they never will and will be brave trying, how many times does the news repeat it self as they are oblivious of it.
|
|
 Edit  Reply w/quote |
|
|
| REPLIED Saturday, November 07, 2009 10:00:19 AM |
|
|
| REPLIED Saturday, November 07, 2009 10:56:19 AM |
|
|
| REPLIED Saturday, November 07, 2009 11:01:03 AM |
|
The-Wildcat said:
I agree in some examples, like killing Venom was stupid since he was a secondary character for starters and Cyclops was dumb since he was a main character in the whole Phoenix saga but not for Green Goblin, I think his death gave the story for these 3 movies, with Harry slowly turning into a new Green Goblin, if Norman lived, I can't imagine how the story would still be exciting with character development.
let me just add tho, in these movies, if you don't see it, it didn't happen. I'm sure Cyclops is alive, his too much of a main character to have died in secrecy. My guess is the Alter Plain, I really think I said that wrong? That other dimensional Plain where Xavier sometimes goes to. and we know Xavier's alive already and sure is Venom since his gonna have his own Spin-off, I mean, the Symbiot didn't die, so neither did Venom |
|
|
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
|
| REPLIED Saturday, November 07, 2009 11:23:18 AM |
|
|
| REPLIED Saturday, November 07, 2009 01:00:17 PM |
|
|
| REPLIED Saturday, November 07, 2009 02:25:31 PM |
|
|
| REPLIED Saturday, November 07, 2009 05:10:08 PM |
|
marvelfan said:
Every side is a valid point, but it is shame when characters that are barely been discovered die off, Venom, Two-face, Dr.Octopus and maybe a few others still need development in there and it is shame and premature how it all ends up.
Movies should think about making long series and spin offs before hand, that is what the comics do and are at best utilising such material.
I understand what you mean but movies ain't as stable as comics, Directors get bored, actors get bored, allot of re casting is necessary, then we get flops and with flops, fans ask for reboots or remakes and then it starts all over again. Batman is the best example, 4 movies, they were gonna do a fifth, what if they did a fifth? what if they replaced the director with a better one? could the franchise still have been saved if they made a good sequel to "Batman & Robin" ? I dont think neither of us could say for sure, so now we got Two-Face again, and the Joker, Villains are repeating already,
do you guys think Super-Hero movies could last 20 or more sequels like James Bond?
btw, I'm not picking sides, I'm simply putting this out there, it is an interesting question. |
|
|
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
|
|
|
