Final Destination 3
EDITORS
LEAD EDITOR:
pimpjoe_esb
Send me news!
E-mail me!
ASSISTING:
No one yet!
(Wanna help out?)
GOT INFO?
REGISTERIT'S FREE!
Register Now!
RECEIVE custom news
TRACK your favorites
BUILD your fan profile
POST messages
LOGIN | SIGN UP TODAY
THIS WEEK
Ninja Assassin(11/25)
Nine(11/25)
Old Dogs(11/25)
MORE
NEXT WEEK
Brothers(12/04)
MORE
Final Destination 3 Buy Final Destination 3
New Post Chat - Coming Soon! Submit Info Write Review Track This
BOARD
Home
  Final Destination 3 Forum
NEW POST
REPLY
Who's Here? None in this thread. 57 users total online. Moderators: Nobody yet!.
ROLLERCOASTER!?? This wasn't possible, HE DIDNT GO
volt
Member

oxford,n/a
POSTS: 5
MEMBER SINCE: 2006-02-16 		READ MY PROFILE
ADD TO FRIENDS
VOTE FOR ME
E-MAIL ME
POSTED Thursday, February 16, 2006 02:51:30 PM Delete post? (Moderator ONLY)
Sorry to ruin this for anyone. The rollercoaster incident was caused by one guy dropping his camera. That was in her vision anyways. Then when it came to the real incident, the guy WITH the camera got off the ride!?? Therefore the whole incedent couldnt of happened, as nothing caused teh crash....

Can sum1 explain this to me or have the done this rong?

Cheers, Volt.

Edit Edit  Reply w/quote Reply w/quote
volt
Member

oxford,n/a
POSTS: 5
MEMBER SINCE: 2006-02-16 		READ MY PROFILE
ADD TO FRIENDS
VOTE FOR ME
E-MAIL ME
REPLIED Thursday, February 16, 2006 03:00:21 PM Delete post? (Moderator ONLY)
Gotta reply on a nother post, just for any1 else who is wondering :P

TonyG said:

Ha! That's funny.
The camera did start the whole death sequence... in the vision version.

But after she and the others got off the rollercoast, she changed death's design.

Everyone who stayed on the rollercoaster still needed to die on the rollercoaster as that was their "destiny" so to speak.
Death would have changed its design, and caused something else on the tracks to make the cars derail.

The people who got off had to deal with their changes of death designs so that they all ended up dying as was death's plan.
edit Edit reply w/quote Reply w/Quote
hoppusrulz_05
Member

Newry,in
POSTS: 1
MEMBER SINCE: 2006-02-21 		READ MY PROFILE
ADD TO FRIENDS
VOTE FOR ME
E-MAIL ME
REPLIED Tuesday, February 21, 2006 05:54:49 PM Delete post? (Moderator ONLY)
Yeah i noticed this aswell, but the hydraulics were faulty also wernt they? the liquid was leaking, and also at the start when they are walkin onto the ride they look up and the steel of the ride is shaking dangerously, but i think this is a blunder

edit Edit reply w/quote Reply w/Quote
Scarlet_Spide
r
Member

Sunbury,in
POSTS: 823
MEMBER SINCE: 2005-06-19 		READ MY PROFILE
ADD TO FRIENDS
VOTE FOR ME
E-MAIL ME
REPLIED Wednesday, February 22, 2006 09:07:43 AM Delete post? (Moderator ONLY)
i just think this whole film was thought out poorly. i bet the writers didn't even realise this camera loophole causing fans to cover up for it.

edit Edit reply w/quote Reply w/Quote
pimpjoe_esb
Member

Cajun City
POSTS: 27198
MEMBER SINCE: 2003-11-21 		READ MY PROFILE
ADD TO FRIENDS
VOTE FOR ME
E-MAIL ME
REPLIED Wednesday, February 22, 2006 10:08:39 AM Delete post? (Moderator ONLY)
Wasn't there gas leaking?

The Gambler X-Stud
United States Marine

"Live fast. Die young. Save yourself."
edit Edit reply w/quote Reply w/Quote
mxslimak189
Member

Beverly Hills,CA
POSTS: 577
MEMBER SINCE: 2006-01-17 		READ MY PROFILE
ADD TO FRIENDS
VOTE FOR ME
E-MAIL ME
REPLIED Wednesday, February 22, 2006 06:06:23 PM Delete post? (Moderator ONLY)
pimp joe is right, there was some sort of leak that couldve caused this crash anyways. And the guys camera just sparked it to crash quicker.

edit Edit reply w/quote Reply w/Quote
Combat Llama
Member

Stevenage,in
POSTS: 1
MEMBER SINCE: 2006-07-02 		READ MY PROFILE
ADD TO FRIENDS
VOTE FOR ME
E-MAIL ME
REPLIED Sunday , July 02, 2006 06:59:38 PM Delete post? (Moderator ONLY)
But ...

the camera caused the breaking of the hydrolics, so if there was no guy to drop the camera in the real accident, then there would be no camera on the tracks to cause the breaking of hte hydrolics meaning there would be no accident ..

so death has no part in it its just a mistake ... damn them to hell

i must say one thing BOB SAGET !!

edit Edit reply w/quote Reply w/Quote
Kal-El1974
Member

Kennesaw,GA
POSTS: 157
MEMBER SINCE: 2006-05-28 		READ MY PROFILE
ADD TO FRIENDS
VOTE FOR ME
E-MAIL ME
REPLIED Sunday , July 02, 2006 07:20:58 PM Delete post? (Moderator ONLY)
Most movies have mistakes.

www.myspace.com/keithmath
ley
edit Edit reply w/quote Reply w/Quote
A_Crow_Named_
Draven
Member

Cocoa Beach,FL
POSTS: 3759
MEMBER SINCE: 2003-02-07 		READ MY PROFILE
ADD TO FRIENDS
VOTE FOR ME
E-MAIL ME
REPLIED Sunday , July 02, 2006 07:26:11 PM Delete post? (Moderator ONLY)
just enjoy the blood guts and gore! it's horror! it doesn't need to make perfect sense!!!!!

or that's me

The Crow Deadite
The Erased X-Stud
Mortician of the Instiution


edit Edit reply w/quote Reply w/Quote
kyle1
Member

Marrero,LA
POSTS: 145
MEMBER SINCE: 2006-05-28 		READ MY PROFILE
ADD TO FRIENDS
VOTE FOR ME
E-MAIL ME
REPLIED Sunday , July 02, 2006 07:40:41 PM Delete post? (Moderator ONLY)
Death always plans his scenes before they happen. Actually there was a leak (as said earlier) and even if there was no camera the tracks weren't working so the the coaster was on its own and one of the tracks was brokin which caused it to flip. And when hte rollercoaster finally would have come to a stop it would have been on the loop, remember so it would have gone backwards. And the camera did not cause the breaking of the hydrolics because it was leaking before the camera dropped. I have the movie on bootleg.

edit Edit reply w/quote Reply w/Quote
pimpjoe_esb
Member

Cajun City
POSTS: 27198
MEMBER SINCE: 2003-11-21 		READ MY PROFILE
ADD TO FRIENDS
VOTE FOR ME
E-MAIL ME
REPLIED Sunday , July 02, 2006 07:54:08 PM Delete post? (Moderator ONLY)
A_Crow_Named_Draven said:

just enjoy the blood guts and gore! it's horror! it doesn't need to make perfect sense!!!!!


Good point. As for me I enjoyed it. It didn't matter if there were mistakes or not. I just loved the gore!

The Gambler X-Stud
United States Marine

"Live fast. Die young. Save yourself."
edit Edit reply w/quote Reply w/Quote
wicked2009
Member

Upper Sandusky,OH
POSTS: 2
MEMBER SINCE: 2006-08-01 		READ MY PROFILE
ADD TO FRIENDS
VOTE FOR ME
E-MAIL ME
REPLIED Tuesday, August 01, 2006 12:21:31 PM Delete post? (Moderator ONLY)
I've Come To Save The Movie!

The hydrolics did break when they guy pushed down on lewis's harnis thing. But they all then got off. And yes the TRACK itself is broken so why the car hit the camera it just made the whole thing worse by loosening the harises. Without the hydrolics rupsuring all the cars do is flip off because of the TRACK. so you see all the hydrolics did is alow them to fall from the cars when they flipped and thats all that the camera missing changed! There is no movie mistake there! The writers new what they were doing! All you have to do is be a true Final Destination fan and you would know!

I feel better now. Next time STOP MAKIN OUT DURIN THE MOVIE AND PAY ATTENTION!!! Only then can you complain!

edit Edit reply w/quote Reply w/Quote
Kilo-1
Member

Milwaukee,WI
POSTS: 9
MEMBER SINCE: 2006-08-04 		READ MY PROFILE
ADD TO FRIENDS
VOTE FOR ME
E-MAIL ME
REPLIED Friday , August 04, 2006 09:20:33 PM Delete post? (Moderator ONLY)
Combat Llama said:

But ...

the camera caused the breaking of the hydrolics, so if there was no guy to drop the camera in the real accident, then there would be no camera on the tracks to cause the breaking of hte hydrolics meaning there would be no accident ..

so death has no part in it its just a mistake ... damn them to hell

i must say one thing BOB SAGET !!


Quit being picky, there's a lot of things in FD3 that couldn't work out. Like when the sign fell on the guy, after all those firecracker sshot out waaaayy far behind him. Or the fact that the emergency braek on the train didn't work. =\

edit Edit reply w/quote Reply w/Quote
TheResidentEv
il
Member

Minneapolis,MN
POSTS: 5
MEMBER SINCE: 2007-03-13 		READ MY PROFILE
ADD TO FRIENDS
VOTE FOR ME
E-MAIL ME
REPLIED Tuesday, March 13, 2007 11:34:56 AM Delete post? (Moderator ONLY)
Actually, the sign falling is relatively believable...they weren't very large fireworks...especially if they were sitting in that cart...by hitting the arm of the machine, it weakened everything...therefore causing the sign to fall...

And if you have ever been on a New York subway...you'd question whether the E break will work or not...They don't do maintenance as much as they'd like you to believe...besides, something could have snapped when it was pulled so hard...

edit Edit reply w/quote Reply w/Quote
NEW POST REPLY
CountingDown.com © 1998-2006. All Rights Reserved.
BACK TO TOP Learn more about us. Read our terms & conditions, and our privacy policy.
Want to contact us? Click here. Lost? Try the site map.