Alexander
EDITORS
LEAD EDITOR:
Kit-Kat
Send me news!
E-mail me!
ASSISTING:
No one yet!
(Wanna help out?)
GOT INFO?
REGISTERIT'S FREE!
Register Now!
RECEIVE custom news
TRACK your favorites
BUILD your fan profile
POST messages
LOGIN | SIGN UP TODAY
THIS WEEK
? Nothing Scheduled
MORE
NEXT WEEK
Brothers(12/04)
The Lovely Bones(12/11)
The Princess and the Frog(12/11)
MORE
Alexander
New Post Chat - Coming Soon! Submit Info Write Review Track This
BOARD
Home
  Alexander Forum
NEW POST
REPLY
Who's Here? None in this thread. 54 users total online. Moderators: Nobody yet!.
Oliver Stone talks Alexander Failures
PantherX20
Member

Miami,FL
POSTS: 12143
MEMBER SINCE: 2002-08-11
READ MY PROFILE
ADD TO FRIENDS
VOTE FOR ME
E-MAIL ME
POSTED Friday , December 31, 2004 10:24:54 PM Delete post? (Moderator ONLY)
http://www.moviesonline.c
a/movienews_2279.html


Oliver Stone and Moritz Borman the chairman of Intermedia sat down with Variety and answered some questions about Alexander, the epic that many fans are not exactly thrilled over. Myself I have not seen it yet. So I reserve my comments. Made for $150million the movie has only brought in $33million. Oliver Stone being a stand up director says he can see some failures in the film.

"In some way," Stone told Variety, "I failed to communicate his story properly to that audience. I still think it's a beautiful movie, but Alexander deserved better than I gave him."

Moritz Borman told Variety that despite the issues they wont lose money on this film, but future films will be harder to get made.

"We will not lose a penny. But if the picture doesn't work in some foreign territories, (distributors) will take the hit. ...If the picture makes over $100 million foreign, most will be OK. But if the picture fares the way it did here, they will lose.

"Having a picture that underperformed as badly as this one did here hurts in other ways," Borman says. "Next time we go to Warner Bros. with a picture like this, they might say no. Those foreign buyers who lost will be looking for a rebate next time they come back to the table."

Oliver also took time to talk about the homosexual angle of the movie, which has upset many viewers, I know we have had many many reviews submitted to us talking about this angle and how it bothered them.

"They called him Alexander the Gay. That's horribly discriminatory, but the film simply did not open in the South, in the Bible Belt. There was clear resistance to the homosexuality.

"If I could go back, I'd have put events in linear order and limited the voiceovers. I'd have gotten the film to 2= hours and taken out the homosexuality for the U.S. market and for countries sensitive to such things, like Korea or Greece. Kids weren't comfortable with men who hugged, a king who cries and expresses tenderness," Stone said.


by the way, I'm retarded.



CHECK THIS OUT: http://leftfordead1.250fr
ee.com/main.html


http://leftfordead1.hyper
boards2.com/index.cgi



Edit Edit  Reply w/quote Reply w/quote
NEW POST REPLY
CountingDown.com © 1998-2006. All Rights Reserved.
BACK TO TOP Learn more about us. Read our terms & conditions, and our privacy policy.
Want to contact us? Click here. Lost? Try the site map.