Taskmaster said:

same as the cinema
complete bullcrap

its so wrong
1. the public have never ever ever liked spiderman
2. the sandman had nothin to do with uncle bens death and is not mraly good on any level
3.that guy out of that 70s show as venom was so stupid its not even funny hes got a stupid voice and was a terrible pick for venom
4.the hob goblin would neva in a million years help spider-man it just would not happen

that film was crap

Taskmaster said:

same as the cinema
complete bullcrap

its so wrong
1. the public have never ever ever liked spiderman
2. the sandman had nothin to do with uncle bens death and is not mraly good on any level
3.that guy out of that 70s show as venom was so stupid its not even funny hes got a stupid voice and was a terrible pick for venom
4.the hob goblin would neva in a million years help spider-man it just would not happen

that film was crap

Taskmaster said:

yeah yeah whatever i dnt care if im not super eager
but atleast i no that film was so wrong in so many ways even in little ways like the reporter for that new york news was english??? and very annoying
and what was that message in the web thing about talk about lame
that film did not stay true to spider-man on anything

and for your information that venom was so wrong his voice wasnt even distorted when he was venom it was just his normal voice and he didnt even have a personality disorder like what actully happens to eddie brock in the comics for example he didnt talk about himself in plural

im right

Dr.OttoOctavius said:

Taskmaster said:

same as the cinema
complete bullcrap

its so wrong
1. the public have never ever ever liked spiderman
2. the sandman had nothin to do with uncle bens death and is not mraly good on any level
3.that guy out of that 70s show as venom was so stupid its not even funny hes got a stupid voice and was a terrible pick for venom
4.the hob goblin would neva in a million years help spider-man it just would not happen

that film was crap

HA! apparently someone doesnt know much about sandman or harry's goblin for that matter. Ok, first off, Sandman was at one point trying to play the role of the hero with spider-man back when Venom made his sinister six. Sandman and Spider-man teamed up and defeated Venom's six but in the end Venom bit Sandman and SANDMAN BECAME ILL, he didnt die like everyone wants to so blindly believe. After he became ill he went to a beach to try to merge with more sand in some last ditch effort to become well again, it didnt work and it split it into multi sand-people (?) and they all merged back together as one, except for sand-mans good side which crumbled away into the air, sandman however did not become "more" evil as a result. Harry's goblin only existed because of his inner struggle with alcohol, the unknown truth of his fathers death and his hatred for spider-man, which was played out very well in all three, and yes Harry did come to his senses when he badly beat spider-man in the osborne masion and then threw some pumpkin bombs on timers inside the harry realized what he was doing and threw spider-man out the masion just before it exploded and killed harry. The public never ever liked spider-man? you need your head checked and Venom? yeah so what? a lot of people didnt like the pick but guess what? heroes and villians go through drastic changes through their careers get over it.

Scarlet_Spider said:

Dr.OttoOctavius said:

Taskmaster said:

same as the cinema
complete bullcrap

its so wrong
1. the public have never ever ever liked spiderman
2. the sandman had nothin to do with uncle bens death and is not mraly good on any level
3.that guy out of that 70s show as venom was so stupid its not even funny hes got a stupid voice and was a terrible pick for venom
4.the hob goblin would neva in a million years help spider-man it just would not happen

that film was crap

HA! apparently someone doesnt know much about sandman or harry's goblin for that matter. Ok, first off, Sandman was at one point trying to play the role of the hero with spider-man back when Venom made his sinister six. Sandman and Spider-man teamed up and defeated Venom's six but in the end Venom bit Sandman and SANDMAN BECAME ILL, he didnt die like everyone wants to so blindly believe. After he became ill he went to a beach to try to merge with more sand in some last ditch effort to become well again, it didnt work and it split it into multi sand-people (?) and they all merged back together as one, except for sand-mans good side which crumbled away into the air, sandman however did not become "more" evil as a result. Harry's goblin only existed because of his inner struggle with alcohol, the unknown truth of his fathers death and his hatred for spider-man, which was played out very well in all three, and yes Harry did come to his senses when he badly beat spider-man in the osborne masion and then threw some pumpkin bombs on timers inside the harry realized what he was doing and threw spider-man out the masion just before it exploded and killed harry. The public never ever liked spider-man? you need your head checked and Venom? yeah so what? a lot of people didnt like the pick but guess what? heroes and villians go through drastic changes through their careers get over it.

Come on, we can't just lie in wait until a new person makes a single mistake so we can attack them with our 'superior' knowledge. Just correct them.

Yeah someone does have a superiority complex, but it ain't Taskmaster.

Taskmaster said:

[/quote]
Someone has a superiority complex. . .

Maverick Hunter said:

Taskmaster said:

Someone has a superiority complex. . .

Taskmaster said:



1. the public have never ever ever liked spiderman

pyro935 said:

Taskmaster said:

yeah yeah whatever i dnt care if im not super eager
but atleast i no that film was so wrong in so many ways even in little ways like the reporter for that new york news was english??? and very annoying
and what was that message in the web thing about talk about lame
that film did not stay true to spider-man on anything

and for your information that venom was so wrong his voice wasnt even distorted when he was venom it was just his normal voice and he didnt even have a personality disorder like what actully happens to eddie brock in the comics for example he didnt talk about himself in plural

im right

Someone has a superiority complex. . .

allan_shizaar said:

IT WAS AWESOME!!!!!!!!

In particular the color of the flames as the DVD started to burn, once I set the case on fire.

megatron0630 said:

I loved the movie more on DVD then i did in the movies. It was longer then i remember so when an extended cut comes around i don't feel like i need it casue it be too damn long

also listening to the commentary and i got to say, James Franco and Topher Grace are the only actors that want to come back and yet there dead

allan_shizaar said:

IT WAS AWESOME!!!!!!!!

In particular the color of the flames as the DVD started to burn, once I set the case on fire.

Scarlet_Spider said:

Dr.OttoOctavius said:

Taskmaster said:

same as the cinema
complete bullcrap

its so wrong
1. the public have never ever ever liked spiderman
2. the sandman had nothin to do with uncle bens death and is not mraly good on any level
3.that guy out of that 70s show as venom was so stupid its not even funny hes got a stupid voice and was a terrible pick for venom
4.the hob goblin would neva in a million years help spider-man it just would not happen

that film was crap

HA! apparently someone doesnt know much about sandman or harry's goblin for that matter. Ok, first off, Sandman was at one point trying to play the role of the hero with spider-man back when Venom made his sinister six. Sandman and Spider-man teamed up and defeated Venom's six but in the end Venom bit Sandman and SANDMAN BECAME ILL, he didnt die like everyone wants to so blindly believe. After he became ill he went to a beach to try to merge with more sand in some last ditch effort to become well again, it didnt work and it split it into multi sand-people (?) and they all merged back together as one, except for sand-mans good side which crumbled away into the air, sandman however did not become "more" evil as a result. Harry's goblin only existed because of his inner struggle with alcohol, the unknown truth of his fathers death and his hatred for spider-man, which was played out very well in all three, and yes Harry did come to his senses when he badly beat spider-man in the osborne masion and then threw some pumpkin bombs on timers inside the harry realized what he was doing and threw spider-man out the masion just before it exploded and killed harry. The public never ever liked spider-man? you need your head checked and Venom? yeah so what? a lot of people didnt like the pick but guess what? heroes and villians go through drastic changes through their careers get over it.

Come on, we can't just lie in wait until a new person makes a single mistake so we can attack them with our 'superior' knowledge. Just correct them.

Yeah someone does have a superiority complex, but it ain't Taskmaster.

infamous_emijayne said:

2nd worst comic film = 2nd worst comic DVD

It makes complete sense to me....

BTW...It really does make pretty hues of blue and purple when burning. Almost as pretty as Superman Returns did....

IcEXMaNuSa said:

megatron0630 said:

I loved the movie more on DVD then i did in the movies. It was longer then i remember so when an extended cut comes around i don't feel like i need it casue it be too damn long

also listening to the commentary and i got to say, James Franco and Topher Grace are the only actors that want to come back and yet there dead

Wrong on that one, one of their characters that was thought to be dead in the third will return in the next film. It was stated by one of the actors at the spider-man 3 premiere that I attended. As far as who, I cant say but, you can pretty much take a lucky guess as to who it is and there has been talk about the character having a solo film and thats all I am going to say... I know that Sony watches the boards so I am keeping my trap shut.

I DO KNOW for a fact that during filming the actor who played JJJ son had something to do with the meteorite landing in ny. I spoke to a few other actors who were backround for this scene. This person is also sending me a copy of a magazine that confirms this scene. Prior to the opening of spider-man 3 in movie theatres it refers to the character of JJJ son being responsible for the meteorite coming to earth. Not that any cares about this scene since there were a load of deleted scenes taken out to begin with. When I get the magazine I will post it up on here for anyone that is interested the magazine is called movie magic ( April issue ) on page 53.

Dr.OttoOctavius said:

allan_shizaar said:

IT WAS AWESOME!!!!!!!!

In particular the color of the flames as the DVD started to burn, once I set the case on fire.

good for you for wasting your money! Oh, maybe next you'll waste your money on the transformers dvd too!

allan_shizaar said:

Dr.OttoOctavius said:

allan_shizaar said:

IT WAS AWESOME!!!!!!!!

In particular the color of the flames as the DVD started to burn, once I set the case on fire.

good for you for wasting your money! Oh, maybe next you'll waste your money on the transformers dvd too!

I'll admit, spending the $14.99 on the P.O.S. did kind of hurt a bit.

But watching it burn just made me feel SOOO much better!! It really put it all in perspective. The warm feeling I got in my heart as the pretty blues and purples fluttered was great!

The real waste was the film itself.

Transformers on the other hand is sitting high and mighty on my DVD collection. Why would I burn such a great film. Whats wrong with you???

Maverick Hunter said:

allan_shizaar said:

Dr.OttoOctavius said:

allan_shizaar said:

IT WAS AWESOME!!!!!!!!

In particular the color of the flames as the DVD started to burn, once I set the case on fire.

good for you for wasting your money! Oh, maybe next you'll waste your money on the transformers dvd too!

I'll admit, spending the $14.99 on the P.O.S. did kind of hurt a bit.

But watching it burn just made me feel SOOO much better!! It really put it all in perspective. The warm feeling I got in my heart as the pretty blues and purples fluttered was great!

The real waste was the film itself.

Transformers on the other hand is sitting high and mighty on my DVD collection. Why would I burn such a great film. Whats wrong with you???

Yeah seriously, it's as if he didn't even notice your sig pic lol

Maverick Hunter said:

allan_shizaar said:

Dr.OttoOctavius said:

allan_shizaar said:

IT WAS AWESOME!!!!!!!!

In particular the color of the flames as the DVD started to burn, once I set the case on fire.

good for you for wasting your money! Oh, maybe next you'll waste your money on the transformers dvd too!

I'll admit, spending the $14.99 on the P.O.S. did kind of hurt a bit.

But watching it burn just made me feel SOOO much better!! It really put it all in perspective. The warm feeling I got in my heart as the pretty blues and purples fluttered was great!

The real waste was the film itself.

Transformers on the other hand is sitting high and mighty on my DVD collection. Why would I burn such a great film. Whats wrong with you???

Yeah seriously, it's as if he didn't even notice your sig pic lol