BloodStone said:

I am glad it's makeing it money back but the whole john connor going back in time to london thing just sounds stupid.
We are finally at the war and they want to go back a step?!?

It's not impossible to make another future war terminator film, all they have to do is cut back on the action a bit and focus on dialog and the hard life style of living underground eating rats and stuff.

Iron Knight Sting said:

Just say no to time travel back to London. If they to a T5, they need to make significant progress towards the end of the war. Preferably, they'd leave us on a big cliffhanger at the end with both victory and defeat within sight, setting up a T6 as the finish to the franchise. Honestly, I don't think T:S was nearly as bad as it was made out to be. I think the biggest problem was that it was PG-13 instead of R like the first 3. If McG & the studio will return T5 to R, I think the rest will work itself out.

TheRiddlerKid said:

I don't think it will green light a sequel, or if it does the budget will be significantly decreased. According to Wikipedia (that internet source that is never wrong) the budget was estimated to be 200 million, the total intake at the moment appears to be slightly over that mark which must be quite disappointing for the studios who probably saw this film as one of their tent poles.