PyroGurl said:

I was hoping for a PG-13, but it didn't really make a difference to me anyway.

bmw_666 said:

but does the material in the book that the movie is based on warrant a PG-13 rating?

pimpjoe_esb said:

I think it was obvious it was gonna get a PG rating.

fosho574 said:

WHAT!? first PG-13 perfect, no need to take it to R but nothing less then PG-13! G is out of the question, even PG, this isnt a childerns book, no kids are checking this bookout of the school library. This is a stroy that has violence why should the older audience that grew up with this book not get the arse kicking? I look at this movie as a tribute the childern of the 80's. The only thing I look forward to more then an awesome battle scenes is the "turkish delights" YUM

Da girl in da jeans said:

pimpjoe_esb said:

I think it was obvious it was gonna get a PG rating.

Personally, I agree too.

I think though, there were quite a few people who had their fingers crossed it would be PG-13 (or G).

fosho574 said:

ok I need to take back what I said because i read it as a kid BUT (and Im only speaking out of greed) I just dont want the movie to be hinderd because its for childeren. I want the this movie to be all it can be. The first book may be that way but after that the level gets kicked up a notch on all fronts. If they make a pg-13 directors cut then we all win!

pimpjoe_esb said:

I think it was obvious it was gonna get a PG rating.

the1ring said:

Gee whiz!!!!

Were the first three Potter movies lame?

Were the first FIVE star wars movies lame?

I don't think so. And I don't think Star Wars necessarily got better when it was PG-13.

Trust me, we have nothing to worry about. This movie will still be good.

And, like some of us have said, the later books in the series will probably get a higher rating. Fear not.

BatSTUD said:

the1ring said:

Gee whiz!!!!

Were the first three Potter movies lame?

Were the first FIVE star wars movies lame?

I don't think so. And I don't think Star Wars necessarily got better when it was PG-13.

Trust me, we have nothing to worry about. This movie will still be good.

And, like some of us have said, the later books in the series will probably get a higher rating. Fear not.

Did the first three Harry Potter movies feature war?

Epic battles? Armies going at it with each other?

Sword fights?

Hmmm...I don't think so.

the1ring said:

BatSTUD said:

the1ring said:

Gee whiz!!!!

Were the first three Potter movies lame?

Were the first FIVE star wars movies lame?

I don't think so. And I don't think Star Wars necessarily got better when it was PG-13.

Trust me, we have nothing to worry about. This movie will still be good.

And, like some of us have said, the later books in the series will probably get a higher rating. Fear not.

Did the first three Harry Potter movies feature war?

Epic battles? Armies going at it with each other?

Sword fights?

Hmmm...I don't think so.

All the Star Wars movies did and only the last one was PG-13. Wow, the first 5 must have had the worst action scenes ever and I didn't notice. I thought they were good but when I realized they were PG, they sucked.

hulk33 said:

It felt like a PG-13 movie towards the end to me. It may have not been as intense as LOTR but it was pretty intense. The battle was awesome and as I said intense and had some great battle scenes. At first I was sceptical because of the PG rating but after seeing it I have to say the movie was pretty close to being PG-13 and personally it did not hurt the film in anyway shape or form no matter what it was rated.

Da girl in da jeans said:

*shakes head* I'm sorry BatSTUD, but that argument with the lightsabers isn't too strong.

Doesn't matter anyways, y'all are beating the dead horse.