Nightwing said:

Is the cinematic Superman is dead? Nope. Far from it. While it's true SR wasn't a huge hit like WB wanted, but it's far from being a big failure. With them doing a sequel, it surely not a failure. Plus, SR doesn't just rely on just theater to make money. There are DVD, merchandise, etc. Plus, it's still a big hit with the IMAX. I heard it continue to break records.

infamous_emijayne said:

Nightwing said:

Is the cinematic Superman is dead? Nope. Far from it. While it's true SR wasn't a huge hit like WB wanted, but it's far from being a big failure. With them doing a sequel, it surely not a failure. Plus, SR doesn't just rely on just theater to make money. There are DVD, merchandise, etc. Plus, it's still a big hit with the IMAX. I heard it continue to break records.

Why do you continue to ignore stone cold facts presented to you?? WB has said themselves that DVD sales will not make up the nearly $190 million gap between budget and breaking even...They are doing a sequel because their partner on SR didn't take as big of a hit and THEY want to make a sequel in the hopes of gaining a profit from the FRANCHISE...

If this film had a $150 million budget and made what it has, THEN and only then could you say it was not a failure.

forrest52 said:



I didn't see him try to argue with him, he just gave his opinion on the post question why did you decide to jump into it with him?

forrest52 said:

infamous_emijayne said:

Nightwing said:

Is the cinematic Superman is dead? Nope. Far from it. While it's true SR wasn't a huge hit like WB wanted, but it's far from being a big failure. With them doing a sequel, it surely not a failure. Plus, SR doesn't just rely on just theater to make money. There are DVD, merchandise, etc. Plus, it's still a big hit with the IMAX. I heard it continue to break records.

Why do you continue to ignore stone cold facts presented to you?? WB has said themselves that DVD sales will not make up the nearly $190 million gap between budget and breaking even...They are doing a sequel because their partner on SR didn't take as big of a hit and THEY want to make a sequel in the hopes of gaining a profit from the FRANCHISE...

If this film had a $150 million budget and made what it has, THEN and only then could you say it was not a failure.

I didn't see him try to argue with him, he just gave his opinion on the post question why did you decide to jump into it with him?

forrest52 said:

Really? Because the reverse of that concept never seems to work for you guys. Or maybe I should type facts in all caps to get my point across.....FACTS, there now everyone will understand.

BatSTUD said:

forrest52 said:

Really? Because the reverse of that concept never seems to work for you guys. Or maybe I should type facts in all caps to get my point across.....FACTS, there now everyone will understand.

That's because the reverse of that statment is illogical and RETARDED.

forrest52 said:

infamous_emijayne said:

Nightwing said:

Is the cinematic Superman is dead? Nope. Far from it. While it's true SR wasn't a huge hit like WB wanted, but it's far from being a big failure. With them doing a sequel, it surely not a failure. Plus, SR doesn't just rely on just theater to make money. There are DVD, merchandise, etc. Plus, it's still a big hit with the IMAX. I heard it continue to break records.

Why do you continue to ignore stone cold facts presented to you?? WB has said themselves that DVD sales will not make up the nearly $190 million gap between budget and breaking even...They are doing a sequel because their partner on SR didn't take as big of a hit and THEY want to make a sequel in the hopes of gaining a profit from the FRANCHISE...

If this film had a $150 million budget and made what it has, THEN and only then could you say it was not a failure.

I didn't see him try to argue with him, he just gave his opinion on the post question why did you decide to jump into it with him?

forrest52 said:

BatSTUD said:

forrest52 said:

Really? Because the reverse of that concept never seems to work for you guys. Or maybe I should type facts in all caps to get my point across.....FACTS, there now everyone will understand.

That's because the reverse of that statment is illogical and RETARDED.

It's a two way street brother, there are facts on both sides of every argument. ha ha you used caps again....good for you....*squeezes cheeks, and pats on head*

X2Magneto said:

I can't get over [SPOILER] the giant kryptonite island only taking away his powers and not killing him. He didn't feel it working on him... [/SPOILER]

Longshot said:

No, the idea that the future of Superman in the movies is in jeapordy is just silly. The franchise has thrived and survived many interpretations over the last century. Now WB may want to change directors and change Supe's costume to a more traditional looking suit, but I would suggest they keep the same cast and push forward. Make Superman Volume 2: Episode 2 more action oriented and bring in some major bad guys from the comics.

I have to say, that's always been the one thing that irritated me with every Superman incarnation not headed by Bruce Timm. Where are the villains from the comics? If you look at the old Fleisher seriels or the old George Reeves tv show or the Chris Reeve films or Lois and Clark, where are the baddies from the comics?

At least Smallville is starting to bring in characters from the comics. I'd like to see that continue in the next Superman film.

But Superman is not dead in the movies. Make a better movie and the fans will come.

Nightwing said:

Longshot said:

No, the idea that the future of Superman in the movies is in jeapordy is just silly. The franchise has thrived and survived many interpretations over the last century. Now WB may want to change directors and change Supe's costume to a more traditional looking suit, but I would suggest they keep the same cast and push forward. Make Superman Volume 2: Episode 2 more action oriented and bring in some major bad guys from the comics.

I have to say, that's always been the one thing that irritated me with every Superman incarnation not headed by Bruce Timm. Where are the villains from the comics? If you look at the old Fleisher seriels or the old George Reeves tv show or the Chris Reeve films or Lois and Clark, where are the baddies from the comics?

At least Smallville is starting to bring in characters from the comics. I'd like to see that continue in the next Superman film.

But Superman is not dead in the movies. Make a better movie and the fans will come.

Agree. Again, Longshot know what he's talking about. What we couldn't do without him here? And btw, you said your occupation is marketing business or something? I don't remeber, so I thought I ask.

BatSTUD said:

Nightwing said:

Longshot said:

No, the idea that the future of Superman in the movies is in jeapordy is just silly. The franchise has thrived and survived many interpretations over the last century. Now WB may want to change directors and change Supe's costume to a more traditional looking suit, but I would suggest they keep the same cast and push forward. Make Superman Volume 2: Episode 2 more action oriented and bring in some major bad guys from the comics.

I have to say, that's always been the one thing that irritated me with every Superman incarnation not headed by Bruce Timm. Where are the villains from the comics? If you look at the old Fleisher seriels or the old George Reeves tv show or the Chris Reeve films or Lois and Clark, where are the baddies from the comics?

At least Smallville is starting to bring in characters from the comics. I'd like to see that continue in the next Superman film.

But Superman is not dead in the movies. Make a better movie and the fans will come.

Agree. Again, Longshot know what he's talking about. What we couldn't do without him here? And btw, you said your occupation is marketing business or something? I don't remeber, so I thought I ask.

LMAO...

JHBLADER05 said:

BatSTUD said:

Nightwing said:

Longshot said:

No, the idea that the future of Superman in the movies is in jeapordy is just silly. The franchise has thrived and survived many interpretations over the last century. Now WB may want to change directors and change Supe's costume to a more traditional looking suit, but I would suggest they keep the same cast and push forward. Make Superman Volume 2: Episode 2 more action oriented and bring in some major bad guys from the comics.

I have to say, that's always been the one thing that irritated me with every Superman incarnation not headed by Bruce Timm. Where are the villains from the comics? If you look at the old Fleisher seriels or the old George Reeves tv show or the Chris Reeve films or Lois and Clark, where are the baddies from the comics?

At least Smallville is starting to bring in characters from the comics. I'd like to see that continue in the next Superman film.

But Superman is not dead in the movies. Make a better movie and the fans will come.

Agree. Again, Longshot know what he's talking about. What we couldn't do without him here? And btw, you said your occupation is marketing business or something? I don't remeber, so I thought I ask.

LMAO...

How many times has your ass fallen off??

Nightwing said:

[And btw, you said your occupation is marketing business or something? I don't remeber, so I thought I ask.

Longshot said:

Nightwing said:

[And btw, you said your occupation is marketing business or something? I don't remeber, so I thought I ask.

Marketing. I am a project coordinator for a Philly firm.

Longshot said:



Marketing. I am a project coordinator for a Philly firm.

Nightwing said:

I knew I was correct there.

Tokey said:

It's not dead, I dont care at this point though... they need to stop this franchise and wait a few years before attempting another. And for the love of God KILL Superman in the first movie of the new franchise, its just brilliant from a fanboy and average movie goer perspective. Singer is a fool for not doing that.

Anyway, im more interested in the ressurection of Batman. After all those years of embaressment... its about time the world forgets about Shumacher being linked to the character in any way.

MARTIANCAVEMAN said:

The only thing that's dead about Superman is the fagget original costume.

They need to get rid of those panties.

Longshot said:

MARTIANCAVEMAN said:

The only thing that's dead about Superman is the fagget original costume.

They need to get rid of those panties.

Watch the language.

MARTIANCAVEMAN said:



Isn't that what hes wearing on the original costume?